Crane & Rigging Training
Do Overhead Crane Operators Need NCCCO Certification? What OSHA Actually Requires - NCCCO crane & rigging training

Do Overhead Crane Operators Need NCCCO Certification? What OSHA Actually Requires

By Jo Martin · Published September 21, 2026

1,000+
Companies Served
50
States + Territories
13
Crane Types Certified
OCONUS
Overseas Bases Served
✓ NCCCO-Accredited Practical Testing ✓ OSHA 1926 Subpart CC ✓ All Crane & Rigging Types ✓ On-Site or Goldsboro Yard ✓ Nationwide & OCONUS
NCCCO
Accredited
OSHA
1926 Subpart CC
All Types
Crane & Rigging
On-Site
or Goldsboro Yard

By Jo MartinSep 21, 202622 min read

Overhead bridge crane inside a factory bay

Overhead crane certification requirements start with a surprise: federal OSHA does not require a certification card to run an overhead or gantry crane in a plant. It requires something harder to fake: an employer who can show why the person on the pendant was “designated” as qualified. Here is where the construction certification rule actually stops, what the general industry standard puts on the operator’s own shoulders, what the ASME B30 volumes expect on top of it, and what the voluntary CCO Overhead Crane Operator exam tests when a plant decides to use it.

Overhead crane certification requirements: two standards, two different verbs

The sentence everyone quotes comes from construction. 29 CFR 1926.1427(a) says the employer must ensure each operator is “trained, certified/licensed, and evaluated” before operating equipment covered by Subpart CC. Three verbs, and the middle one is the one people remember. It is backed by a full apparatus: accredited testing organizations under paragraph (d), audited employer programs under paragraph (e), a five-year validity period, and a documented employer evaluation under paragraph (f) on top of the card.

The bridge crane hanging over a machine shop, a steel service center or a paper mill is not in that world. It lives in general industry, under 29 CFR 1910.179, a standard whose design baseline is still the ANSI B30.2.0-1967 code for cranes installed on or after August 31, 1971, and which contains no operator certification requirement anywhere in its text; the only “certification” it mentions is the inspection certification record. Its operator rule is one sentence, at 1910.179(b)(8): “Only designated personnel shall be permitted to operate a crane covered by this section.” The definition at 1910.179(a)(35) does the rest of the work. Designated means “selected or assigned by the employer or the employer’s representative as being qualified to perform specific duties.”

Read the two side by side and the difference is not a loophole. Construction makes the credential a precondition and then still demands an employer evaluation. General industry skips the credential and puts the whole weight on the employer’s selection. The word “qualified” is not defined anywhere in 1910.179, and OSHA has said what it does with that gap. In a 1999 letter about a boatyard travel lift, the agency wrote that because the term is not defined, it “would interpret ‘qualified’ in light of operator-qualifications provisions of industry standards such as ANSI B30.2.” A compliance officer who wants to test a designation reaches for the consensus standard, and so should you. If the vocabulary is new, certified, qualified and competent are three different legal ideas, and this post leans on all three.

Where the construction certification rule stops for overhead cranes

Overhead and gantry cranes are named in the scope of Subpart CC at 1926.1400(a), which is why so many people assume the certification rule reaches them. The answer is one section further in. 29 CFR 1926.1438(a) says that for overhead and gantry cranes “permanently installed in a facility,” including semigantry, cantilever gantry, wall cranes and storage bridge cranes, the requirements of 1910.179 apply “and not the requirements of this subpart CC,” with the single exception of 1910.179(b)(1). A contractor rebuilding a press line under the plant’s own bridge crane is doing construction work, but that crane’s operator rule is still designation, not certification.

Paragraph (b) of the same section is the trap in the other direction. Overhead and gantry cranes that are “not permanently installed in a facility” and used in construction get a specific list of Subpart CC sections, and 1926.1427 through 1926.1434 are on it. The text names overhead/bridge cranes, semigantry, cantilever gantry, wall cranes, storage bridge cranes, launching gantry cranes and “similar equipment having the same fundamental characteristics, irrespective of whether it travels on tracks, wheels, or other means.” Those operators need certification, the employer evaluation, and the rest. The section also pulls in named paragraphs of 1910.179 and, for equipment manufactured on or after September 19, 2001, listed sections of ASME B30.2-2005 by reference.

Two more Subpart CC provisions matter on the floor. Under 1926.1441, equipment with a maximum rated hoisting capacity of 2,000 pounds or less is outside 1926.1427 altogether, and paragraph (e) still requires the employer to train each operator, before operating, “on the safe operation of the type of equipment the operator will be using.” And the exclusion list at 1926.1400(c) removes some things people mistake for cranes: “machinery that hoists by using a come-a-long or chainfall,” telescopic/hydraulic gantry systems, and stacker cranes are all outside the subpart. The digger derrick exclusion gets its own post because it is the one that bites utility crews.

What “designated” has to mean on your floor

OSHA has been asked, more than once, what an employer owes under 1910.179 when the standard is silent, and the answers are consistent. The 1999 travel-lift letter is the clearest: designation is the employer’s act, “qualified” is read against ANSI B30.2, and the powered industrial truck training rule in 1910.178(l) does not apply to a machine that is really a mobile gantry crane. A March 1983 letter, answering a question about an operator blind in one eye, said 1910.179 “does not include any physical qualifications for overhead and gantry crane operators” but that “an employer has the responsibility to determine whether crane operators can safely perform their work,” and that the physical qualifications in ANSI B30.17-1980 were advisory and could not be enforced under 1910.179. Nothing in those letters lets an employer designate someone by saying so. All of them describe a determination the employer has to be able to explain afterward.

The standard itself tells you what that determination has to cover, because it assigns the operator specific duties. An operator who has been designated in name only will fail them in front of a compliance officer without knowing it. Under 1910.179 the operator must:

Those are not training suggestions. They are the operator-facing text of an enforceable standard, and several are written as employer duties (“the employer shall require that the operator avoid carrying loads over people”). A designation that cannot produce an operator who performs them is a designation with nothing behind it. The daily and monthly checks in 1910.179(j) sit on top of this; the shift, monthly and annual inspection rhythm has its own post. The narrower point is that the operator’s daily look at hooks, hoist chains and operating mechanisms is the front end of the monthly certification records, so an operator who was never taught what a cracked hook or a stretched chain looks like breaks the inspection program too.

The last piece is the general duty clause. Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act requires each employer to furnish employment “free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm.” OSHA’s own memos use it as the enforcement route for lifting equipment 1910.179 does not reach, and an untrained operator on a bridge crane is exactly the kind of recognized hazard it was written for. Maximum penalties in 2026 are $16,550 per serious violation and $165,514 per willful or repeated violation under OSHA’s penalty schedule, and a designation citation does not come cheaper because the rule it cites is one sentence long.

The cranes 1910.179 does not cover at all

The scope at 1910.179(b)(1) is overhead and gantry cranes “including semigantry, cantilever gantry, wall cranes, storage bridge cranes, and others having the same fundamental characteristics,” grouped “because they all have trolleys and similar travel characteristics.” The definitions do the sorting. An overhead crane has “a movable bridge carrying a movable or fixed hoisting mechanism and traveling on an overhead fixed runway structure,” and a gantry crane is the same idea with the bridge “rigidly supported on two or more legs running on fixed rails or other runway.”

A large share of the lifting equipment in the average plant is not in that scope, and OSHA has said so in writing for decades. A March 1991 letter answered the direct question: 1910.179 “does not apply to underhung cranes, overhead hoists, or monorails,” and pointed to ANSI B30.11-1980, a consensus standard, for underhung cranes and monorails. An April 1984 memorandum to a regional administrator said the same for “monorails, monorail cranes, top running single girder cranes and overhead hoists,” and told field staff to regulate hazards on that equipment under Section 5(a)(1) while referencing the applicable ANSI standard — at the time B30.11 for monorails and underhung cranes, B30.16 for overhead hoists and B30.17 for top-running single-girder cranes with underhung hoists. A June 2017 enforcement memo on monorail hoists restated the general industry position: no specific standard applies, so the general duty clause does, and complying with the relevant portions of ASME B30.17-2015 is one way to meet it.

So the underhung monorail hoist over the assembly line and the workstation crane with an underhung trolley are outside 1910.179(b)(8) entirely. The pillar jib crane at the welding cell is too, by definition rather than by letter: no bridge, no runway, so it never meets the (a)(8) definition, and ASME puts jib cranes in B30.17’s scope. A traveling wall crane on a runway is different; 1910.179(a)(14) defines it and (b)(1) covers it. None of this is a pass. It means the operator’s qualification is measured against the consensus standard directly, through the general duty clause, without even the one-sentence designation rule between the employer and the citation. Training for a jib crane and for a bridge crane has to be scoped separately for exactly this reason: the machines differ, and so does the legal footing under each one.

What ASME B30.2, B30.17 and B30.16 add on top of OSHA

The letters all point at the same shelf. ASME B30.2, currently the 2022 edition, applies to “hand-operated and power-driven overhead and gantry cranes that have a top-running single-girder or multiple-girder bridge, with one or more top-running trolley hoists,” plus cantilever gantry, semi-gantry and wall cranes. ASME B30.17 covers “overhead cranes and monorail systems with either an underhung trolley or bridge, or both,” with a scope list that runs from underhung bridge cranes through jib cranes, portable gantries and monorail systems; asme.org now lists a 2026 edition, and the volume absorbed the old B30.11 monorail standard. ASME B30.16, in its 2022 edition, covers overhead underhung and stationary hoists, hand-chain, electric and air-powered, chain and wire rope.

The text of the B30 volumes is paywalled, so this post will not quote clauses it cannot show you. What the published tables of contents do show is structure, and structure is enough to build a program around. B30.2-2022 has a Chapter 2-3 titled “Operator Training and Operation,” with Section 2-3.1 “Crane Operator Training,” Section 2-3.2 “Training for Persons Other Than Crane Operators,” Section 2-3.3 “Operation,” Section 2-3.4 “Planning for Load Handling Activities,” Section 2-3.5 “Hoist Limit Devices (Switches)” and Section 2-3.8 “Crane Lockout/Tagout,” followed by a separate Chapter 2-4 for maintenance training. B30.17-2020 mirrors it with Chapter 17-3 “Operator Training and Operation” and Section 17-3.1 “Operator Training.” B30.16-2022 has Chapter 16-3 “Operator Training and Operation” and a Chapter 16-2 “Inspection and Testing.”

Read those headings the way an auditor would. The consensus standard OSHA uses to interpret “qualified” separates operator training from the training of everyone else around the crane, treats load-handling planning as its own discipline, and expects the operator to understand limit devices and lockout. A plant program that consists of a video and a signature does not map onto that outline, and a compliance officer holding the B30.2 table of contents can see the gap in about a minute. On a 1926.1438(b) construction site the listed B30.2-2005 sections are incorporated by reference outright, and the standard stops being interpretive guidance and becomes the rule.

The voluntary CCO Overhead Crane Operator certification, and what it tests

NCCCO runs an Overhead Crane Operator certification that no federal general industry rule requires. Its content was set by an NCCCO task force of crane operators, training directors, managers, supervisors and manufacturers, and its published outline is a useful benchmark even for plants that never send anyone to test. Candidates must be at least 18 years old, comply with NCCCO’s substance abuse policy and code of ethics, and pass a written and a practical exam within 12 months of each other, in either order.

The written exam is a single multiple-choice test; its question count and time limit are in the current Overhead Crane Operator candidate handbook. Its outline weights pre-operation activities, work requirements and load handling at approximately 27 percent each, shutdown and securing at approximately 4 percent, and technical knowledge at approximately 15 percent. The pre-operation domain reads like a checklist for a designation program: locating and verifying access to the main runway disconnect, lockout/tagout condition resolution, pendant control strain relief, warning and capacity labeling, limit devices and control functions, the brake test procedure, and load block, hook and latch requirements. The technical knowledge domain names its references: ASME B30.2, ASME B30.20 for below-the-hook lifting devices, OSHA 1910.179, and OSHA 1910.184 on slings.

The practical exam is offered on either of two crane types, cab operated or pendant/remote control, and runs six tasks: a pre-operational shift inspection, a true vertical lift, placing the load in a circle, negotiating a right-angle corridor with obstructions, a trolley laydown, and safe securing procedures. Two-blocking the crane, dropping the ball or load hook on the ground, contacting the crane or an obstruction with the test weight, or failing to respond to a stop signal are unsafe acts that end the test, and a candidate disqualified that way cannot test on any crane until the next day. Certification is valid for five years. Recertification runs in the 12 months before expiration on the same written exam, with the practical waived for candidates who attest to at least 1,000 hours of crane-related experience during the certification period and no grace period after the date; the recertification deadlines post covers the windows and what happens if you lapse.

The program is accredited by the ANSI National Accreditation Board to ISO/IEC 17024, which is what makes it usable under 1926.1427(d) when a gantry crane that is not permanently installed needs a certified operator on a construction site. Everywhere else it is a tool, not a compliance box. Under 1926.1427(f)(3), “possession of a certificate or degree cannot, by itself, cause a person to be qualified,” and while that sentence is construction text, it is the correct instinct in a plant too: the card proves the person passed a standardized test on a test crane, and the employer still has to designate them for the hot-metal crane in their own bay. Plants that want both the designation and the credential usually run overhead crane certification alongside the internal program rather than instead of it.

Which rule governs the operator: a decision table

Situation Governing text Operator requirement What the file has to show
Bridge, gantry, wall or storage bridge crane permanently installed in a plant (general industry) 29 CFR 1910.179(b)(8) and (a)(35) Designated by the employer as qualified; no federal certification Training and evaluation records that explain the designation; monthly hook, chain and running-rope certification records under (j)(2) and (m)(1)
The same permanently installed crane used by a contractor during construction work 29 CFR 1926.1438(a) 1910.179 applies, not Subpart CC; designation, no certification Same records; the contractor’s employees are still the contractor’s to designate
Overhead or gantry crane not permanently installed, used in construction (launching gantry, rail-mounted gantry brought to a job) 29 CFR 1926.1438(b), pulling in 1926.1427 through 1926.1434 Certified (accredited testing organization, audited employer program, or qualifying government license) plus the employer evaluation Certification valid five years, a license no longer than five; evaluation record with operator, evaluator, date, make, model and configuration under 1926.1427(f)(6)
Construction equipment with a maximum rated capacity of 2,000 pounds or less 29 CFR 1926.1441(e) Trained on the safe operation of the type of equipment; 1926.1427 does not apply Training record; no certificate
Underhung crane, monorail, jib crane or overhead hoist in general industry OSH Act Section 5(a)(1), read with ASME B30.17 and B30.16 (OSHA letters of 1984, 1991 and 2017; jib cranes by the B30.17 scope) No specific OSHA standard; the employer must meet the recognized-hazard duty, and the consensus standard is the yardstick Training and qualification records that track the B30.17 or B30.16 operator training chapters
Monorail hoist mounted on a truck, trailer or scaffold in construction OSHA enforcement memo of June 30, 2017; 29 CFR 1926.554 OSHA will not cite for full Subpart CC compliance if the hoist meets 1926.554, operators are trained under 1926.21, the employer has determined each operator qualified under 1926.20(b)(4), and the supporting vehicle or structure meets its own rules Training records and a documented qualification determination
Crane at a marine terminal or in longshoring 29 CFR 1917.27(a) and 1918.98(a) Determined by the employer to be competent by training or experience and familiar with the signal code in use; medical exclusions in paragraph (a)(2) The employer’s competency determination; the port crane post covers the machines
State or city with its own crane operator licensing State or local rule (NCCCO counts 16 states and 7 cities) Depends on the rule’s definitions; California’s general-industry rule, Title 8 §5006.1, is titled for mobile and tower cranes Read the scope paragraph before assuming it covers or exempts overhead cranes

Building a designation that survives an inspection

Because 1910.179 does not spell out the program, the best available template is the record the construction rule requires and the outline the consensus standard uses. Neither is mandatory in a plant, and both are what an inspector, an insurer or a plaintiff’s attorney will compare your file against. Here is what a defensible designation file contains, crane by crane.

  1. A written training outline tied to the equipment class. 1910.179 defines cab-operated, floor-operated, pulpit-operated and remote-operated cranes separately, and a pendant operator and a cab operator do not share a hazard profile. Cover the 1910.179 operator duties listed above, the crane’s limit switches and controls, the rated load markings that (b)(5) requires on each side of the crane and, where there is more than one hoisting unit, on each hoist or its load block, below-the-hook lifting devices, and the plant’s lockout procedure for the runway disconnect. A general industry crane training outline that follows the B30.2 chapter structure is the easiest one to defend.
  2. A hands-on evaluation on the crane the operator will run. Model it on the CCO practical: a shift inspection, a vertical lift with the hook centered over the load, a controlled route with obstructions, a set-down, a securing sequence, and the brake test at a load approaching rated capacity. The evaluator has to be someone who can judge, which in 1926.1427(f)(4) language is “an individual who has the knowledge, training, and experience necessary to assess equipment operators.” Plants without one usually build one through overhead crane train-the-trainer instruction.
  3. The designation record itself. Borrow the construction list at 1926.1427(f)(6): the operator’s name, the evaluator’s name and signature, the date, and the make, model and configuration of the crane. Add the control type (cab, pendant, remote) and the bay or crane number. One page per operator per crane class is enough, and it is the page that turns “we told them they could run it” into evidence.
  4. Triggers for re-evaluation, written down. The construction rule requires retraining and re-evaluation when performance or an evaluation shows it is needed (1926.1427(b)(5) and (f)(7)). Adopt the same triggers in the plant: a new or modified crane, a near miss, an observed deficiency on the floor, or a long absence from the controls. A crane idle for a month or more has to be inspected before it goes back in service under 1910.179(j)(4), and an operator idle that long deserves the same look.
  5. Inspection records the operator can explain. Monthly certification records for hooks, hoist chains and running ropes must carry the date, the signature of the person who did the inspection and an identifier for the item. A 1997 OSHA letter accepted an electronic system that identifies the inspector in place of a signature and called a missing signature de minimis, but the record still has to exist. If the operator does the daily look, the operator should be able to say what a hook with more than 15 percent growth in throat opening or more than a 10-degree twist means: under (l)(3)(iii) it is discarded.

Keep the file where the crane is, not on a corporate drive. The construction rule’s phrasing, that the evaluation document be “available at the worksite while the operator is employed by the employer,” is the right instinct for a plant as well, because an inspector opening an inspection at the start of first shift is not going to wait for HR. What general contractors and plant owners ask for when they prequalify a contractor is a variation of the same folder, and the prequal paper trail post lists it.

Three plants, one question each

A steel service center with a cab-operated bridge crane, a pendant-controlled bridge crane and an underhung monorail hoist. Two of the three are 1910.179 cranes. Each operator needs a designation supported by a training outline and an evaluation on that control type; the cab operator’s evaluation does not transfer to the pendant crane without a look at the different controls and the floor-level travel hazards. The monorail hoist is outside 1910.179 under the 1984 and 1991 letters, so its operators are measured against B30.17 through the general duty clause, and the file should say which B30.17 topics were covered. No certification is required for any of the three; if the plant wants CCO cards anyway, the pendant/remote practical matches one bridge crane and the cab-operated practical matches the other.

A precast yard with a rail-mounted gantry crane. Inside the yard the gantry is a 1910.179(a)(6) gantry crane, and designation applies. The same gantry disassembled, trucked to a bridge project and re-erected to set segments is now equipment “not permanently installed in a facility” used in construction under 1926.1438(b), and the operator needs certification plus the 1926.1427(f) evaluation before the first pick. Same machine, same operator, different rule, and the difference is where it is bolted down. That second situation is what gantry crane operator certification is for.

A boatyard with a mobile boat hoist. The 1999 letter settles this one: a travel lift built, maintained, operated and inspected to ANSI B30.2 is a mobile gantry crane under 1910.179, so the forklift training rule does not apply and the designation rule does. The letter also told the boatyard it could still find 1910.178 useful when writing its training and evaluation program, which is how most good general industry crane programs get built: from the nearest rule that actually says something.

Designation is a one-sentence rule with the whole burden of proof on the employer, which makes it a harder standard than a card, not an easier one.

Frequently asked questions

Is NCCCO crane operator certification required to run an overhead crane?

Not by federal OSHA for a crane permanently installed in a general industry facility. 1910.179(b)(8) requires designated personnel, and designation is an employer determination. NCCCO certification is required when 1926.1427 applies, which for overhead and gantry cranes means equipment not permanently installed in a facility and used in construction under 1926.1438(b), or when a contract, a site owner, a union agreement or a state or city rule calls for it. Many plants use the CCO Overhead Crane Operator exam as the testing half of their designation program because its outline is built on 1910.179 and ASME B30.2, and overhead crane operator qualification is the employer-side half that the card does not replace.

Does OSHA require gantry crane training?

In effect, yes. Gantry, semigantry, cantilever gantry and storage bridge cranes are inside 1910.179 by definition, so the designation rule and the operator duties in paragraph (n) apply, and a designation the employer cannot explain is a violation. OSHA’s 1999 letter treated a boatyard travel lift as a mobile gantry crane under the same section. What gantry crane training has to add over bridge crane training is the machine’s travel: legs on rails or wheels at floor level, runway and track condition, the automatic rail clamps and wind-indicating device that 1910.179(b)(4) requires on outdoor storage bridges, and the people who walk past the legs. A gantry that is not permanently installed and is used in construction is a certification case under 1926.1438(b).

Is there an NCCCO overhead crane certification, and what is on the exam?

Yes. The CCO Overhead Crane Operator program is a single written exam plus a six-task practical on either a cab-operated or a pendant/remote-control crane, with the domain weights and task list laid out in the certification section above. It is valid for five years. The mobile, tower and overhead comparison explains how it differs from the mobile crane designations.

How often do overhead cranes and hoists need to be inspected?

1910.179(j) sets two classes for cranes in regular service: frequent inspections at daily to monthly intervals and periodic inspections at 1- to 12-month intervals, with the interval set by the crane’s activity, severity of service and environment. Hooks and hoist chains get a daily visual check and a monthly inspection with a signed, dated certification record, and running ropes get a thorough inspection at least once a month with the same kind of record. A crane idle for one to six months is inspected under (j)(2) plus (m)(2) before it goes back to work; idle more than six months, it gets the complete (j)(2) and (j)(3) inspection. “Annual hoist inspection” usually means a periodic inspection done at the 12-month end of that range. Hoists outside 1910.179, such as underhung and stationary hoists, take their inspection classes from ASME B30.16’s inspection and testing chapter instead, and overhead crane inspection training has to cover both.

Can a CCO card replace the employer’s own evaluation?

No. In construction, 1926.1427(f)(3) says a certificate cannot by itself make a person qualified, and paragraph (f) requires a documented employer evaluation on top of the card. In general industry there is no certification requirement to begin with; the card is evidence that supports a designation, nothing more. The employer evaluation gap post explains why certified operators still get their employers cited. Verify any card you rely on before it goes in the file; the verification post shows how.

Do overhead crane operators need a state license?

NCCCO’s licensing resource counts 16 states and 7 cities with crane operator licensing requirements, and notes that certification becomes mandatory where a state adopts it as the basis of a licensing program, as West Virginia and New Jersey have. Read the definitions in your jurisdiction’s rule before assuming anything. California’s general-industry certification section, Title 8 §5006.1, is titled “Mobile Crane and Tower Crane — Operator Qualifications and Certification,” and a rule written that way says nothing about the bridge crane in a plant. The license versus certification page keeps the two ideas apart.

Where does overhead crane training happen, and what does certification cost?

A designation program is delivered on your own cranes, because the evaluation has to be on the control type and equipment class the operator will actually run, so “near me” for overhead crane training is your own facility. CCO exam fees are published by NCCCO on its exam fees page and tracked in the certification cost post; they change, and the designation the employer owes does not.

Authoritative References

Plant crane operators to qualify? Call (252) 274-0583 or request a quote — we deliver overhead crane operator training and certification and the documented employer qualification that 1910.179 expects, on your floor nationwide and OCONUS.

Author

About the Author

Jo Martin — Safety Professional, CCO-Certified Operator, Lift Director, Rigger & Signal Person. Twenty years in crane and rigging safety, holding CCO certifications as a crane operator, lift director, rigger, and signal person. Writes the compliance side of the blog the way it reads on a jobsite, not in a binder.

Reviewed by Patrick Salazar, NCCCO-certified crane operator (LBC, TLL, TSS, STC, tower), Rigger Level I & II, Mobile & Tower Crane Inspector — every article on this site is checked against current OSHA and NCCCO requirements before it publishes.

Keep Reading

More from the blog

← All Posts
5.0 on Google27 reviewsRead them on Google →

“Training by 3PSafety was excellent! The instructor, Patrick, was patient, knowledgeable, and engaging. Focus included strict emphasis on hazard prevention and emergency protocols.”

Ernie · Google review

“I’ve been running cranes for twenty plus yrs. I went to Patrick and 3psafety to make durn sure I was up to date and up to par on all the ever changing rules and regulations.”

Roy H. · Google review

“Pleasure to work with, extremely knowledgeable. I’d highly recommend 3P Safety for safety and equipment training needs.”

Ready to Train Your Crew?

Tell us your crane types, crew size, and location. We schedule NCCCO operator, rigger, and signal-person testing on your jobsite nationwide and OCONUS, or at our Goldsboro, NC yard.

Call (252) 274-0583Get a Quote
Follow 3P Safety: Facebook | Instagram | X | YouTube